By Mira Sundar, Staff Writer
How could Lot’s wife’s greatest transgression be her wish to witness? Was Pandora blameworthy for exploring her own jar? Why is Eve’s desire to know the grave origin of all sin?
Historically, women have been marked inherently vulnerable to moral failure. Her worth is her avoidance of eventual corruption and her proximity to purity and absolute innocence. The body is human, mortal–existing only to withstand harm, and survive, yet is only holy if a virgin. Once explored, it becomes stained and damned. Her existence is defined by her inevitable fall.
This essay examines how ancient mythology and religious doctrine influence the gendered double standards of female morality, explores why female curiosity has been interlaced with disaster and spiritual failure, and how these well-known stories may result in a more sexist culture today.
Religious tradition has played a large role in reinforcing these narratives. In early Christian writings, Eve, of The Fall, is blamed for humanity’s fall and Adam’s decisions. Tertullian, writing around 200 CE, famously declared, “You [Eve] are the devil’s gateway; you are the unsealer of that tree.” Though Eve’s behavior in Genesis reflects natural human curiosity, patristic theologians construed it as uniquely feminine and dangerous, only assigning her full blame.
Eve is expected, as young girls are, to be like a pure angelic figure: gentle, obedient, and almost God-like. She is confined by rigid expectations of virtue, since the criteria for female goodness are impossibly narrow. Women are held disproportionately more responsible for their actions than their male counterparts, and are blamed, regardless of the circumstances, for deviation from them.
Jeremy Helligar writes in “Medium” that male celebrities need weighty sex offender charges to have their careers affected, while women have their careers destroyed after more trivial offenses, like cheating scandals, using real-life examples such as politician Hillary Clinton and the actress Ingrid Bergman. Female celebrities today have reputations that are more fragile than their male counterparts. Women today, Eve’s daughters, seem to only be regarded as pure at birth, before having behaved independently of their ordinary human desires. They are solely responsible for any slight moral failing of themselves and the actions of men involved in their failure, who acted similarly.
Pandora’s Greek myth frames her curiosity and disobedience as the root of, literally, all worldly tragedies, such as sickness, war, and sorrow. For Zeus’s wish to punish humanity, he orders Hephaestus to create a scapegoat, Pandora, and her box. She is given a jar that she is forbidden to open, but human nature compels her to lift the lid, and the contents of disease, death, and suffering enter the world. She is often wholly blamed for the negative effects of the jar–of singlehandedly plaguing humanity, and again, her curiosity turns to a sinful emotion inherent to women. Women are, in a cultural pattern, held responsible for the consequences of others, often men, as even her resisting orders is so repugnant and criminal that it is enough to fully blame her.
Lot’s wife’s story warns that even a fleeting act of curiosity is condemned. As Sodom burns, she turns to look back despite the angels’ command, and is instantly transformed into a pillar of salt. Her husband continues without consequence, but she alone bears the cost of her apparently sinful female curiosity. This story marks women witnessing reality and knowledge as something offensive. A single display of curiosity is enough proof of her immorality.
Another parallel in contemporary culture is that women exploring sexuality is still labelled a sinful curiosity. A woman’s worth has been bound to her virginity, that is, her purity at infancy. Women are not given knowledge of themselves, as knowledge defies complete innocence and purity. They are given rules and bodily myths. For naively exploring what is marked obscure and other, they turn tainted and immoral.
Carol Murray, Carlos Calderón, and Joaquín Bahamondes in the “International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health” write, “The victim’s clothing, lifestyle, and setting where sexual aggressions occur are often data used to evaluate cases of sexual violence and attribute responsibility to the victim and/or blame the aggressor,” as they draw examples of previously occurred court cases. Her being called a “victim” and “assaulted” centers the woman’s supposed failure to remain pure. She is judged as if she succumbed to a temptation rather than another person’s choices.
So why is female curiosity so feared? Why is a woman’s body her responsibility to keep untainted and her mind to keep naive? Those untainted and untouched are vulnerable, and naivety is stupidity. Her oppressors will eternally build a narrative where she is damned if she ventures out, if she doesn’t listen to orders. Her curiosity has been marked as sinful through mythology and religion because it is, in fact, her gateway out of oppression.
Sources:
Britannica Editors. “Pandora”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 9 Dec. 2025, accessed 2 February 2026 https://www.britannica.com/topic/Pandora-Greek-mythology.
Wikipedia contributors. “Lot’s wife.” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 19 Jan. 2026. Web. 20 Nov. 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lot%27s_wife
Murray C, Calderón C, Bahamondes J. Modern Rape Myths: Justifying Victim and Perpetrator Blame in Sexual Violence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 17;20(3):1663. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031663. PMID: 36767033; PMCID: PMC9914422.
Helligar, Jeremy. “Why Do We Hate Famous Women so Much Harder than Famous Men? | by Jeremy Helligar | Medium.” Why Do We Hate Famous Women So Much Harder Than Famous Men?, Medium, 28 Apr. 2021, jeremyhelligar.medium.com/famous-women-and-the-cult-of-hate-5b68886ab66f.
Kirby, Peter. “Historical Jesus Theories.” Early Christian Writings. 2026. 5 Feb. 2026, http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/tertullian27.html
Randolph, Christopher C. “The Origin of Sin.” The Origin of Sin, Christopher C. Randolph, 18 May 2013, christophercrandolph.wordpress.com/2012/01/07/the-origin-of-sin/.
About the Author
